Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:35

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Show 1433: What Are the Hidden Dangers in the Air We Breathe? - The People's Pharmacy
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Were knights’ lances practical weapons, or were they just for sports?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Elly De La Cruz throws out Javier Baez with mind-boggling 98 mph throw - New York Post
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Travis Kelce Salutes Taylor Swift for Buying Her Masters Back, 'It's Finally Hers' - Bleacher Report
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Kristin Davis Set The Record Straight On Whether She Dated Chris Noth - BuzzFeed
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Replace Your Gmail Password Now, Google Tells 2 Billion Users - Forbes